4.7 Article

Multimode Energy Management for Plug-In Hybrid Electric Buses Based on Driving Cycles Prediction

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TITS.2016.2527244

关键词

Energy management; driving cycle prediction; plug-in hybrid electric bus; single-shaft parallel hybrid powertrain; machine learning; statistical feature

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Driving cycles and road slope are two important factors affecting fuel saving performance of plug-in hybrid electric buses (PHEBs) in Chinese cities. Moreover, onboard auxiliary equipment (e.g., Global Position System receiver and General Packet Radio Service (GPRS) wireless module) of PHEB may provide potential means to communicate with the control center of the bus company, allowing for driving cycle prediction through data communication between foregoing buses and the control center. With this general approach in mind, and by utilizing driving data clustering and driving cycle classifier, this paper presents a multimode switched logic control strategy, targeting fuel economy improvement of the PHEB team for a particular city bus route. First, the normal feature parameters are extracted from the sampled driving history cycles, and the composed feature parameters are given by a mapping of normal feature parameters in this approach. A novel improved hierarchical clustering algorithm is applied for driving cycles' data clustering into four groups. Then, on the basis of the clustering results, support vector machine method is used to predict the current driving cycle. Finally, a switched driving controller is presented according to current type of driving cycle and slope information. Simulation results are compared with those of traditional methods in the given real-world driving cycles of city bus, showing significant improvement, which may offer a theoretical solution with engineering application. Experimental results also demonstrate that the proposed control approach is feasible in the tested bus routes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据