4.5 Article

Evaluation of infrared photography for latent bloodstain visualization and the influence of time

期刊

FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL
卷 331, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.111167

关键词

Infrared photography; Latent bloodstain detection; Forensic

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Infrared photography is an effective method for detecting latent bloodstains on various materials, especially fabrics. However, it is not as effective on materials such as leather, tiles, and wood. Additionally, the time of bloodstain deposition does not significantly affect the ability of infrared and visual light to detect latent bloodstains.
The localization of latent blood traces at crime scenes is generally performed using fluorescent stains although infrared light has previously been recognized as an effective localization test for bloodstains as it is a non-destructive and non-contact technique. The goal of this study was to evaluate infrared photography for the detection of latent bloodstains on a large number of objects with different compositions frequently encountered at crime scenes. In this study we show that infrared light photography was able to detect bloodstains deposited on 71.7% of materials while bloodstains on 29.2% of materials could only be detected using infrared photography and not through visual photography. Bloodstain could be detected on most fabrics composed of 100% polyester, 100% cotton and 100% wool or a combination of these fibers with other types of fiber such as nylon or viscose. For other materials such as leather, tiles, wood, bricks, parquet, infrared did not improve the visibility of the bloodstains. Finally, the influence of the time of bloodstain deposition was tested over the period of 1 week and 1 month and did not reveal major differences compared to stains after 24 h drying time suggesting that time has little influence on the ability of infrared light and visual light to detect latent bloodstains.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据