4.3 Article

Association Between Middle Facet Subluxation and Foot and Ankle Offset in Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity

期刊

FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL
卷 43, 期 1, 页码 96-100

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/10711007211040820

关键词

flatfoot; PCFD; weightbearing computed tomography; WBCT; foot and ankle offset; FAO; middle; facet; subluxation; angle

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found a correlation between MF subluxation and FAO, with 27.5% subluxation identified as a threshold for increased FAO. These findings may assist surgeons in optimizing treatment decisions for PCFD patients.
Background: Subtalar middle facet (MF) subluxation was recognized as a reliable marker for progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD) diagnosis. Foot and Ankle Offset (FAO) is an established measurement, predictive of malalignment severity. The objective of this study was to assess the potential association between MF subluxation and FAO in PCFD patients. Methods: 56 individuals with flexible PCFD (74 feet) were assessed. Two blinded foot and ankle surgeons calculated MF uncoverage, MF incongruence, and FAO. Agreement was quantified using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). A multivariate regression analysis and partition prediction models were applied to assess relationship between values. Results: All ICCs were >0.80. MF subluxation and FAO were found to be correlated (r(s) = 0.56; P < .0001). Changes in the MF subluxation were noticeably explained by FAO and BMI (R-2 = 0.33). MF incongruence was not correlated with the assessed variables (P = .10). In this cohort, an MF subluxation of 27.5% was a threshold for increased FAO (FAO of 3.4%+/- 2.4% when below; FAO of 8.0% +/- 3.5% when above). Conclusion: We found a correlation between MF subluxation and FAO. An MF subluxation of 27.5% was found to be a threshold for higher FAO, which corresponded to a greater malalignment. These data may help surgeons optimize treatment decisions in PCFD patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据