4.4 Article

Simultaneous determination of trichothecene mycotoxins in cereals by LC-MS/MS

期刊

FOOD SCIENCE AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 31, 期 2, 页码 165-174

出版社

KOREAN SOCIETY FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-KOSFOST
DOI: 10.1007/s10068-021-01024-5

关键词

Deoxynivalenol; Dispersive-solid phase; Fusarium; Hazard index; Method validation; Risk assessment

资金

  1. Korea Food Research Institute (KFRI) - Ministry of Science and ICT [E0156500-03]
  2. National Research Council of Science & Technology (NST), Republic of Korea [E0156500-03] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to determine residual trichothecene mycotoxins in cereal samples and successfully applied the methodology to monitor 100 cereal samples from a Korean market. The study found that some bean samples were co-contaminated with deoxynivalenol and HT-2 toxin, with deoxynivalenol being the most frequently detected and highest in amount among the trichothecene mycotoxins.
This study was designed to determine the residual trichothecene mycotoxins in cereal samples. The optimal solvent for extraction was 84% (v/v) aqueous acetonitrile with 1% (v/v) formic acid. The best performing clean-up method was dispersive-solid phase with a mixture octadecyl silica and primary-secondary amine. The recoveries for the studied mycotoxins ranged from 83.3 to 92.8%. The methodology was successfully applied for monitoring 100 cereal samples obtained from a Korean market. The bean sample were found to be co-contamination with deoxynivalenol and HT-2 toxin. Deoxynivalenol possessed the highest detection freauency (4/100) and amount (727.38 mu g/kg) among the trichothecene mycotoxins. The hazard index was less than 1.0 for all the observed mycotoxins in all cereal samples except one white rice sample (1.2681). This results indicated that periodic risk assessments of trichothecene mycotoxin through cereal intake are necessary for the health and safety.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据