4.7 Article

Valorization of cereal by-product hemicelluloses: Fractionation and purity considerations

期刊

FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
卷 151, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2021.110818

关键词

Cereal side stream; Cereal hemicellulose; Arabinoxylan; beta-glucan; Industrial application; Cereal crop

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article discusses the potential of using biomass rich in hemicelluloses from cereal side streams for various applications, emphasizing the need for sustainable and cost-effective methods for hemicellulose purification. It also mentions the added functionality of co-components, providing pathways for future research in developing hemicellulose extraction methods.
The biomass from cereal side streams is rich in valuable components, such as hemicelluloses. Among the hemicelluloses, arabinoxylans and beta-glucans are the most acknowledged for potential health benefits. Numerous publications discuss the potential to use purified forms of these hemicelluloses for various applications. However, as the purification of hemicelluloses may not be economically feasible to upscale, sustainable and cost-effective methods are needed to make their valorization more realistic for industrial applications. Co-components present in hemicellulose-rich fractions may also provide added functionality, such as flavonoid content and antioxidant capacity. This review provides an overview on the feasibility of sustainably upscaling hemicellulose extraction processes, focusing on by-products from different cereal streams. We describe the hemicelluloses' physicochemical properties and provide various possible applications of pure and impure fractions from small scale to pilot and industrial scale. Furthermore, real case examples on the industrial utilization of cereal side streams are enclosed. This review provides pathways for future research for developing the hemicellulose extraction methods to obtain fractions with optimized purity, and offers suggestions to valorize them.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据