4.7 Article

Structural characterisation and sorption capability of whey protein aerogels obtained by freeze-drying or supercritical drying

期刊

FOOD HYDROCOLLOIDS
卷 122, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.107117

关键词

Whey protein isolate; Freeze-drying; Supercritical-CO2-drying; Microstructure; Absorption; Delivery systems

资金

  1. European Commission
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrated that the drying technique used (freeze-drying or supercritical drying) significantly affects the structure and functional properties of whey protein aerogels. Supercritical drying resulted in denser aerogels with smaller pores and slower water and oil uptake kinetics, while freeze-dried aerogels had larger pores and faster uptake rates.
Whey protein isolate (WPI) hydrogels were converted into aerogels by freeze-drying (FD) or supercritical drying (SCD). SCD resulted in denser aerogels, with a network of closely-associated WPI microgel aggregates, and pore size <1 mu m in diameter. In the FD aerogels, individual aggregates were fused and formed a self-supporting protein matrix with larger pores (2-5 mu m in diameter). Both aerogels showed a glass transition at 161 +/- 4 degrees C and maintained their original porosity at room temperature at an equilibrium relative humidity <80%. The kinetics of both water and oil uptake were slower in the SCD aerogel than in the FD aerogel. While water absorption caused aerogel swelling and destructuring, the oil-loaded aerogels retained their integrity and adsorbed up to 75% (w/w) oil. The oil-loaded aerogels showed differences in firmness and oil holding capacity (OHC) depending on the drying procedure applied: SCD samples presented a higher firmness (similar to 30 N) and OHC (similar to 96%) than the FD samples (similar to 19 N, OHC similar to 45%). This study demonstrates that the drying technique selected can substantially alter the functional attributes of whey protein aerogels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据