4.7 Article

Evaluation of starch retrogradation by infrared spectroscopy

期刊

FOOD HYDROCOLLOIDS
卷 120, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.106975

关键词

Starch; Retrogradation; FTIR; Hydrogen bond

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China - China [31972027]
  2. Ten Thousand Talent Program Youth Top-notch Talent Project -China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigated the retrogradation process of starch using Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (FTIR), finding that the ratio of 1047 cm(-1)/1022 cm(-1) increased with storage time and was related to hydrogen bonds. FTIR results were consistent with those from differential scanning calorimetry, with distances of hydrogen bonds decreasing during retrogradation.
Starch is an important component of food, and starch retrogradation is a common phenomenon during the storage of starch-based foods. In this study, the retrogradation process was investigated using Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (FTIR). The relationship between the change in the ratio of 1047 cm(-1)/1022 cm(-1) (R1047/ 1022), and storage time, and changes in hydrogen bonds was studied. With the extension of storage time, the value of R1047/1022 increased. Moreover, at the early (0-7 days) and late (7-35 days) stages, the storage time and the R1047/1022 showed a good linear correlation. The retrogradation degree measured by FTIR was consistent with that obtained from differential scanning calorimetry, and the crystallization kinetics conformed to the Avrami equation. Furthermore, the second derivative of infrared spectroscopy was used to study the changes in hydrogen bonds. With the extension of the retrogradation time, the distance of inter-strand hydrogen bond and inter-double helices hydrogen bond decreased, and the bond energy increased. These results suggest that FTIR, as a simple and fast analytical method, can be used as a means to evaluate the degree of starch retrogradation from the perspective of hydrogen bonding and short-range order.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据