4.7 Review

A review of the presence of formaldehyde in fish and seafood

期刊

FOOD CONTROL
卷 136, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2022.108882

关键词

Formaldehyde; Background level; Risk assessment; Regulation; Analytical tools

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fish is a great source of high-quality protein, good fat, vitamins, and minerals, and can lower blood pressure and reduce the risk of heart attack or stroke. However, the illegal addition of formaldehyde to extend shelf life is a common problem, and it is classified as a human carcinogen. There is also a natural formation pathway of formaldehyde in fish and seafood. Current studies show that the reported levels of formaldehyde in fish are often higher than the recognized safety level, highlighting the need for efforts to measure indigenous formaldehyde levels and strengthen regulations to prevent illegal addition of formaldehyde.
Fish is an excellent source for high-quality protein, good fat (omega 3 and 6), vitamins (B, D), and minerals (Ca, P, Zn, I, Mg, K, etc.) and can lower blood pressure and help reduce the risk of a heart attack or stroke. The illegal addition of formaldehyde (FA) to extend the shelf life is a common problem reported in many countries and the FA is classified as a group 1 human carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). There is also the natural formation pathway of FA in fish and seafood. This article summarises the FA levels in fish and seafood (from 2000), formation pathways, health risk assessment, regulations, and analytical techniques to measure FA. It is shown that the reported FA levels are frequently higher than the recognised safety level of 5 mg/kg. This review highlights the requirement of a broad scale effort to measure the indigenous FA levels in fish and ensure that this can be differentiated by the illegal addition of FA. This will allow the strengthening of regulations and allow monitoring to detect and deter the practice of illegal addition of FA to fish and seafood.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据