4.7 Article

Comparison of volatile compounds and sensory profiles of alcoholic black currant (Ribes nigrum) beverages produced with Saccharomyces, Torulaspora, and Metschnikowia yeasts

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 370, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.131049

关键词

Black currant; Metschnikowia pulcherrima; Metschnikowia fructicola odour; Saccharomyces; Torulaspora delbrueckii; volatile composition

资金

  1. Finnish Food and Drink Industries' Federation
  2. Ella and Georg Ehrnrooth Foundation (Finland)
  3. Finnish Cultural Foundation (Finland) [00190487]
  4. Niemi Foundation (Finland)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Black currants were fermented with different yeasts to produce low-alcohol beverages, leading to significant changes in volatile compounds and sensory characteristics. Non-Saccharomyces yeasts may enhance the black currant aroma, but the beverages all exhibited intense sourness, posing a challenge for the development of alcoholic berry beverages.
Black currants (Ribes nigrum) were fermented with Saccharomyces and non-Saccharomyces yeasts without added sugar to yield low-ethanol-content beverages. The effects of yeasts on the volatile compounds and sensory characteristics were analysed by HS-SPME-GC-MS, GC-O, and generic descriptive analysis. Ninety-eight volatile compounds were identified from the black currant juice and fermented beverages. Significant increases in the contents of esters (131 %), higher alcohols (391 %), and fatty acids (not present in juice sample) compared to initial juice were observed depending on the yeasts used. GC-O analysis revealed the higher impact of esters on the sensory properties of Saccharomyces bayanus-fermented beverage compared to the Torulaspora delbrueckii-fermented beverage. In the sensory evaluation, non-Saccharomyces yeasts resulted in a higher 'black currant odour'. However, all beverages were intensely sour, which can be a significant challenge in the development of alcoholic berry beverages.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据