4.7 Article

Fabrication, characterization and in vitro digestive behavior of Pickering emulsion incorporated with dextrin

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 384, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.132528

关键词

Pickering emulsion; Dextrin incorporation; Physicochemical properties; In vitro digestion; beta-carotene; Lipid digestion

资金

  1. National Institute of Food and Agriculture, USDA, Massachusetts Agricultural Experiment Station [MAS00559]
  2. China Scholarship Council [201906760066]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the effects of adding dextrin to whey protein-stabilized Pickering emulsion on its physicochemical properties and in vitro digestive behavior. The results showed that the emulsion was stable at low dextrin concentrations but exhibited droplet flocculation at higher concentrations. The addition of dextrin increased the viscosity of the emulsion and affected the digestive process and bioaccessibility of nutrients.
Whey protein-stabilized Pickering emulsion was incorporated with dextrin under different concentrations, and their physicochemical properties and in vitro digestive behavior were examined. The result showed that these emulsions were relatively stable at low dextrin addition (< 7.5%), while droplet flocculation appeared at higher concentrations. With progressing dextrin, the apparent shear viscosity significantly increased from 1.7 to 7.3 mPa.s. Further insight into the digestive behaviors of emulsion incorporated with dextrin was determined using a standardized INFOGEST method. Less clump in the oral phase and increasing droplet size in the initial intestine were observed in the emulsion incorporated with dextrin. Based on dextrin incorporation, a significant decrease in the extent of lipid digestion and beta-carotene bioaccessibility was presented. This study implies dextrin may be useful in controlling the texture and in vitro digestive behavior of Pickering emulsions, which may be advantageous for the designation of functional foods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据