4.7 Article

Competitive and noncompetitive fluorescence polarization immunoassays for the detection of benzothiostrobin using FITC-labeled dendrimer-like peptides

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 360, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.130020

关键词

Fluorescence polarization immunoassay; Dendrimer-like peptides; Peptidomimetic; Anti-immunocomplex; Benzothiostrobin

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31772194, 31972311]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFF0210200]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study designed and synthesized different types of tracers for the development of competitive and noncompetitive FPIAs for benzothiostrobin. Tetramer tracers could generate a higher signal-to-noise ratio and sensitivity in the assays.
Peptides obtained from phage display libraries are valuable reagents for small-molecule immunoassays. However, their application in fluorescence polarization immunoassays (FPIAs) is limited by phage particles. Here, monomer, dendrimer-like dimer, tetramer peptidomimetic and anti-immunocomplex tracers were designed and synthesized using lysine as special scaffolds and spacers to develop competitive and noncompetitive FPIAs for benzothiostrobin. The affinity between tracers and monoclonal antibodies or immunocomplexes increased with the tracer valence. A higher signal-to-noise ratio and sensitivity could be generated in the FPIAs based on tetramer tracers. The sensitivities of competitive (50% inhibitory concentration) and noncompetitive (50% saturation concentration) FPIAs were 19.71 +/- 4.65 and 40.43 +/- 2.73 ng mL-1, respectively. The spiked recoveries were 78.3%-105.2% with relative standard deviations (RSDs) of 0.7%-15.4% for the competitive FPIA, while 78.7%-115.3% with RSDs of 0.7%-12.5% for the noncompetitive FPIA. The amounts of benzothiostrobin in rice detected by the FPIAs were consistent with those detected by high performance liquid chromatography.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据