4.7 Article

A FRET-based detection of N-acetylneuraminic acid using CdSe/ZnS quantum dot and exonuclease III-assisted recycling amplification strategy

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 367, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.130754

关键词

Neu5Ac; FRET; Exonuclease III; Recycling amplification; Fluorescent biosensor

资金

  1. Six Talent Peaks Project in Jiangsu Province [JY-078]
  2. Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangnan University [JNKY19_011]
  3. Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province [KYCX20_1826]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A high-sensitive fluorescent biosensor for Neu5Ac has been developed based on FRET between CdSe/ZnS quantum dots (QDs) and BHQ(2), as well as exonuclease III (Exo III)-assisted recycling amplification strategy. The biosensor achieved an ultralow detection limit of 24 fM and good linear response ranges within 0.2-12.5 pM and 12.5-1000 pM, showing great potential for detection of sialic acids modified glycans/lipids in medical diagnosis and food testing.
N-acetylneuraminic acid (Neu5Ac) is widely spread in many biologically significant glycans of mammals, commonly as a terminal alpha-glycoside. It is of great significance to develop analytical techniques for detection of Neu5Ac. Herein, a high-sensitive fluorescent biosensor for Neu5Ac has been developed based on FRET between CdSe/ZnS quantum dots (QDs) and BHQ(2), as well as exonuclease III (Exo III)-assisted recycling amplification strategy. Employing the specially designed three-level FRET systems and fluorescent signal recovery mechanism, together with five-step recycling signal amplification chain reactions, an ultralow detection limit of 24 fM was achieved. Meanwhile, good linear response ranges within 0.2-12.5 pM and 12.5-1000 pM were founded. The assay has excellent performance in real sample detection, and thus offers great potential for detection of sialic acids modified glycans/lipids in the fields of medical diagnosis and food testing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据