4.7 Article

Comparison of quercetin and rutin inhibitory influence on Tartary buckwheat starch digestion in vitro and their differences in binding sites with the digestive enzyme

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 367, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.130762

关键词

Digestibility; Enzyme inhibition; Binding site; Tartary buckwheat starch; Quercetin; Rutin

资金

  1. Chinese Agricultural Research System [CARS-07-E-4]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [32001706]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that quercetin and rutin reduced starch digestion by altering starch structure and inhibiting digestive enzyme activity, with quercetin showing a stronger inhibitory effect. Rutin interacts with enzymes mainly through C-H and O-H on the glycoside structure, causing steric hindrance and limiting the inhibitory effect of quercetin. The glycoside structure weakens rutin's inhibition of digestive enzymes in free forms rather than affecting its anti-digestive effects in bound forms with starch.
Inhibitory effects of flavonoids on starch digestibility were well known, but the structural mechanism was not clear. This study was focused on the diverse effect of quercetin and rutin on digestibility of Tartary buckwheat starch. Results showed that quercetin and rutin reduced the starch digestion by altering starch structure in bound forms and inhibiting digestive enzyme activity in free forms simultaneously, and quercetin showed a stronger effect than rutin. Molecular docking and saturation transfer difference-nuclear magnetic resonance (STD-NMR) revealed different binding site of rutin from quercetin was due to its hydroxyl and hydrogen on the glycoside structure. Rutin interacted with enzymes mainly by C-H and O-H on the glycoside structure which induced steric hindrance and restricted the inhibitory effect of quercetin fraction. The glycoside structure weakened inhibition of rutin on digestive enzymes in free forms rather than influence its anti-digestive effects in bound forms with starch.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据