4.7 Article

Coumarins, psoralens, and quantitative 1H-NMR spectroscopy for authentication of lemon (Citrus limon [L.] Burm.f.) and Persian lime (Citrus x latifolia [Yu.Tanaka] Tanaka) juices

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 359, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129804

关键词

Food fraud; Authentication; Quality; Phenolic compounds

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The mutual adulteration of lemon and lime juices can be detected using coumarins and psoralens as markers. Differentiating between the two fruits and juices produced under varying mechanical stresses is possible through analyzing these compounds. Combining quantitative 1H-NMR spectroscopy with HPLC data provides the best results for distinguishing the mechanical stress levels of the juices.
Mutual adulterations of lemon and lime juices may be detected using coumarins and psoralens as markers. Poor manufacturing practices or legal but mechanically intense processing of lemons were recently suspected to lead to false accusations of deliberate adulterations with lime juices due to potentially unspecific markers. Therefore, we studied coumarin and psoralen profiles in carefully dissected flavedo, albedo, and endocarp of lime and lemon as well as in juices produced under variable mechanical stresses at laboratory and pilot plant scale. Although the marker herniarin was detectable in juices from lime and harshly extracted lemons at low levels, isopimpinellin, bergapten and the herein proposed, tentatively assigned 5-geranyloxy-8-methoxypsoralen represented unambiguously lime-specific markers. Coumarin and psoralen data also allowed differentiating juices produced at differing degrees of mechanical stress. The latter was also possible using quantitative 1H-NMR spectroscopy, which yielded best results when combined with HPLC data on coumarins and psoralens. In the future, the reported approach may be used for establishing a robust database prior to being used in industrial practice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据