4.7 Article

The apoptosis of grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella) muscle during postmortem condition regulated by the cytokines via TOR and NF-κB signaling pathways

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 369, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.130911

关键词

Grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella); Apoptosis; Caspase; Inflammation; Cytokines

资金

  1. China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA
  2. Natural ScienceFoundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20190588]
  3. National Natural Sci-ence Foundation of China [NSFC 31701677]
  4. Jiangsu Agricultural In-dustry Technology System [JATS [2020] 454]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [JUSRP12006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that the transcriptional regulation of multiple cytokines during postmortem alteration in fish muscle positively affects triggering apoptosis, potentially through the regulation of various pro-apoptotic and anti-apoptotic mediators.
Postmortem alteration by apoptosis has significant effects on flesh quality. Currently, the information necessary to understand the apoptotic behavior and the molecular mechanisms during postmortem alteration in fish muscle is still lacking. Activation of apoptosis and the cytokines involved in regulating apoptosis in fish muscle were evaluated during postmortem condition at 4 degrees C for 5 days in terms of apoptotic morphology changes, nucleus DNA fragmentation, caspases activation and related gene expressions. The triggering apoptotic mechanisms associated with multiple cytokines transcriptional levels showed that the up-regulated pro-apoptotic mediators [IFN-gamma 2, TNF-alpha, IL-6, IL-1 beta, IL-17D, IL-12p35 and IL-10 (except IL-15)] and the down-regulated anti-apoptotic mediators of [IL-8 and IL-11 (except TGF-beta and IL-4)] both regulated apoptosis at early stage, which were regulated by NF -KB and TOR, respectively. Results suggested that transcriptional regulation of multiple cytokines produce a positive outcome on triggering apoptosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据