4.7 Article

Multispectral fluorescence sensitivity to acidic and polyphenolic changes in Chardonnay wines - The case study of malolactic fermentation

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 370, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.131370

关键词

Malolactic fermentation; Organic acids; Traceability; PARAFAC components; Fluorescence lifetime; Phasor plot

资金

  1. FEDER
  2. Conseil regional de Bourgogne-Franche-Comte

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Statistical and chemometric analysis was conducted on the fluorescence signatures of three typologies of Chardonnay wines to evaluate their sensitivity to acidic and polyphenolic changes. The dataset was built using Excitation Emission Matrices of fluorescence decomposed by PARAFAC and fluorescence decays mathematically fitted. The combination of multispectral fluorescence parameters offers a new methodology to diagnose fermentative processes.
In this study, stationary and time-resolved fluorescence signatures, were statistically and chemometrically analyzed among three typologies of Chardonnay wines (A, B and C) with the objectives to evaluate their sensitivity to acidic and polyphenolic changes. For that purpose, a dataset was built using Excitation Emission Matrices of fluorescence (N = 103) decomposed by a Parallel Factor Analysis (PARAFAC), and fluorescence decays (N = 22), mathematically fitted, using the conventional exponential modeling and the phasor plot representation. Wine PARAFAC component C4 coupled with its phasor plot g and s values enable the description of malolactic fermentation (MLF) occurrence in Chardonnay wines. Such proxies reflect wine concentration modifications in total acidity, malic/lactic and phenol acids. Lower g values among fresh MLF + wines compared to MLF- wines are explained by a quenching effect on wine fluorophores by both organic and phenolic acids. The combination of multispectral fluorescence parameters opens a novel routinely implementable methodology to diagnose fermentative processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据