4.7 Article

Mantle tissue in the pearl oyster Pinctada fucata secretes immune components via vesicle transportation

期刊

FISH & SHELLFISH IMMUNOLOGY
卷 121, 期 -, 页码 116-123

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsi.2022.01.001

关键词

Pearl oyster; Mantle; Secreted vesicle; Immunity

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFC0310600]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31872543, 32072951]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study revealed that vesicles secreted from mantle epithelial cells of molluscan bivalves transport important immune components into the extrapallial space (EPS), playing a vital role in immunity during shell formation.
Molluscan bivalves secrete shell matrices into the extrapallial space (EPS) to guide the precipitation of rigid shells. Meanwhile, immune components are present in the EPS and shell matrices, which are pivotal in resistant to invaded pathogens, thus ensuring the shell formation process. However, the origin of these components remains unclear. In this study, we revealed numerous vesicles were secreted from the outer mantle epithelial cells by using light and electron microscopes. The secreted vesicles were isolated by gradient centrifugation and confirmed by transmission electron microscopy. Proteomics analysis showed that the secreted vesicles were composed of cytoplasmic and immune components, most of which do not have signal peptides, indicating that they were secreted by a non-classical pathway. Moreover, real-time PCR revealed that some immune components were highly expressed in the mantle tissue, compared to the hemocytes. FTIR analysis verified the presence of lipids in the shell matrices, indicating that the vesicles have integrated into the shell layers. Taken together, our results suggested that mantle epithelial cells secreted some important immune components into the EPS via secreted vesicle transportation, thus cooperating with the hemocytes to play a vital role in immunity during shell formation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据