The role of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor in treatment of retinopathy of prematurity-a current review

The review aims to evaluate the uses of conventional laser therapy and intravitreal injection of various anti-VEGF in terms of efficacy and side effects for the treatment of retinopathy of prematurity. A literature search of the publication, concerning conventional laser treatment and intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF for ROP. A total of 40 articles were reviewed after curation by the authors for relevance. Intravitreal anti-VEGF showed better ocular efficacy in zone I ROP while laser therapy had a lower recurrence rate in zone II. Comparing the two mainstay anti-VEGF agents, bevacizumab showed lower ROP recurrence rate than ranibizumab. Anti-VEGF has a higher chance in developing persistent peripheral avascularisation compared to conventional laser therapy, but a lower chance of developing high myopia. Ranibizumab has a lower systemic absorption than bevacizumab, despite having no difference in the incidence of persistent peripheral avascularisation. In conclusion, it is advised that intravitreal anti-VEGF should be used as the first-line treatment for zone I ROP while laser therapy should be the mainstay for zone II ROP owing to the different pathogenetic mechanisms. In patients with recurrence after initial anti-VEGF injection, that given ranibizumab may opt to repeat the injection while that given bevacizumab should consider supplement laser ablative treatment.

Automated summary

The review evaluated the efficacy and side effects of conventional laser therapy and intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF for retinopathy of prematurity. It found that intravitreal anti-VEGF showed better ocular efficacy in zone I ROP, while laser therapy had a lower recurrence rate in zone II.