4.7 Article

Developing an ANN-based early warning model for airborne particulate matters in river banks areas

期刊

EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS
卷 183, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115421

关键词

Artificial neural network; Early-warning system; Prediction model; Estuary dust

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology in Taiwan [108-2119-M-029-001-A]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study proposed using an artificial neural network to build an early-warning model, utilizing records of past episodes with high concentrations of airborne particulate matter for modeling. Among the developed models, the one considering both environmental media and pollution sources was most accurate in predicting the severity of estuarian dust events, providing useful information for preemptive disaster mitigation measures to be implemented.
The adverse effects of dust storms such as air quality degradation, reduced visibility and property damage are particularly prominent in estuarian regions. To reduce significant property and health risks posed by such river dust storms, an early-warning system is a useful tool that is urgently needed. In this case study of an area near an estuary, an artificial neural network with various sampling strategies is proposed for building an early-warning model. Records of past river episodes involving high concentrations of airborne particulate matter were collected and used for modeling. Among the three models developed, Model III which considers the characteristics of both environmental media and pollution sources was most accurate among other Models in predicting the severity of an estuarian dust events. The results revealed that the proposed forecasting model can efficiently predict highpollution events and thus provide useful information enabling administrators and the public to implement preemptive disaster mitigative measures to avoid the negative health consequences of dust storms within estuarian regions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据