4.5 Review

Chimeric antigen receptor engineered T cells and their application in the immunotherapy of solid tumours

期刊

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/erm.2021.32

关键词

Adoptive cell transfer; chimeric antigen receptor; T cell engineering; tumour immunotherapy

资金

  1. NIH/NCI [CA168912, CA235159]
  2. Augusta University startup package

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article reviews the factors that affect the activation, effector function, in vivo persistence, and antitumor effects of chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T). These factors include T cell subsets, CAR design, expression promoters and delivery vectors, and CAR-T production process. The comparison between CAR signaling and TCR activation is also discussed. The article provides insights into CAR design for solid tumors, focusing on strategies to improve CAR-T tumor infiltration and survival in the hostile tumor microenvironment.
In this article, we reviewed the current literature studies and our understanding of the parameters that affect the chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T's) activation, effector function, in vivo persistence, and antitumour effects. These factors include T cell subsets and their differentiation stages, the components of chimeric antigen receptors (CAR) design, the expression promoters and delivery vectors, and the CAR-T production process. The CAR signalling and CAR-T activation were also studied in comparison to TCR. The last section of the review gave special consideration of CAR design for solid tumours, focusing on strategies to improve CAR-T tumour infiltration and survival in the hostile tumour microenvironment. With several hundred clinical trials undergoing worldwide, the pace of CAR-T immunotherapy moves from bench to bedside is unprecedented. We hope that the article will provide readers a clear and comprehensive view of this rapidly evolving field and will help scientists and physician to design effective CAR-Ts immunotherapy for solid tumours.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据