4.3 Review

Tofacitinib for the treatment of active ankylosing spondylitis in adults

期刊

EXPERT REVIEW OF CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
卷 18, 期 3, 页码 273-280

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/1744666X.2022.2038134

关键词

Ankylosing spondylitis; tofacitinib; spondyloarthritis; JAK-inhibitor; JAK; axial spondyloarthritis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ankylosing spondylitis is a complex inflammatory disorder involving genetic, environmental, and immune system factors. Current treatments include NSAIDs, TNFi, and IL-17i. JAK inhibitors, particularly tofacitinib, have shown efficacy in clinical trials for active ankylosing spondylitis.
Introduction Ankylosing spondylitis, also known as radiographic axial spondyloarthritis, is a complex, immune-mediated inflammatory disorder most commonly involving the spine including the sacroiliac joints. Areas Covered Complex pathogenesis of axial spondyloarthritis involving genetic, environmental, and both innate and adaptive immune systems. Treatment options for ankylosing spondylitis. Pharmacologic properties, efficacy, and safety of tofacitinib, a JAK inhibitor. Data regarding efficacy of approved JAK inhibitors in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis, including tofacitinib, upadacitinib, and filgotinib. Expert opinion Current treatment options of ankylosing spondylitis include NSAIDs, TNFi, and IL-17i. JAK inhibitors present a new class of therapy that has shown efficacy in the treatment of active ankylosing spondylitis in adults. While it has not been directly compared to alternative therapies, tofacitinib has been shown to be effective in both phase II and phase III trials for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis. While these trials did not show any significant difference from placebo in terms of safety, the ORAL Surveillance study showed tofacitinib to be inferior to TNFi when comparing adverse events. Thus, tofacitinib presents a viable treatment option for the management of AS, however shared decision-making regarding risks and benefits will be important.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据