4.3 Article

Flu vaccination in multiple sclerosis patients: a monocentric prospective vaccine-vigilance study

期刊

EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG SAFETY
卷 21, 期 7, 页码 979-984

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2022.2044787

关键词

AEFI; influenza vaccine; multiple sclerosis; observational study; safety

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this observational study of MS patients, flu vaccines were found to be well tolerated with mainly short-term adverse events. Long-term adverse events were detected in a small number of vaccinated patients, but no significant differences in infections or MS relapse were observed between vaccinated and unvaccinated groups.
Background In 2020, the Italian Medicines Agency recommended to bring forward the flu vaccination campaign, whose importance was also emphasized for patients with Multiple Sclerosis (MS). We aimed to assess the safety profile of flu vaccines in terms of occurrence of short-term and long-term Adverse Events Following Immunization (AEFIs). Methods This is an observational study that enrolled MS patients who were eligible for any of the flu vaccines recommended by the Italian medicines Agency. Results 194 patients were enrolled. Out of 133 patients who accepted to be vaccinated, 45 experienced not serious short-term AEFIs (pain at the injection site, headache, flu-like symptoms, fatigue). Long-term AEs were detected in 12 vaccinated patients (flu-like symptoms, COVID-19 and MS relapse). No statistically significant differences in terms of infections or MS relapse were found between vaccinated and unvaccinated groups. Using Kaplan-Meier analysis we observed no differences in the cumulative survival rate in both groups. Conclusion Flu vaccines were well tolerated in MS patients, who mainly experienced not serious short term AEFIs. Considering that COVID-19 vaccines campaign is still ongoing among MS patients, our results might bring new knowledge concerning the safety profile of vaccines in this frail population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据