4.5 Article

Analysis of Damage and Failure in Anisotropic Ductile Metals Based on Biaxial Experiments with the H-Specimen

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL MECHANICS
卷 62, 期 2, 页码 183-197

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11340-021-00774-x

关键词

Anisotropic ductile metals; Damage and failure; Biaxial experiments; Stress state dependence; Loading direction dependence

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) [394286626]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Experimental and numerical studies demonstrate that stress state, load ratio, and loading direction have significant influences on the width and orientation of localized strain fields, as well as the formation of damage mechanisms and fracture modes at the micro-level in anisotropic metals.
Background Dependence of strength and failure behavior of anisotropic ductile metals on loading direction and on stress state has been indicated by many experiments. To realistically predict safety and lifetime of structures these effects must be taken into account in material models and numerical analysis. Objective The influence of stress state and loading direction on damage and failure behavior of the anisotropic aluminum alloy EN AW-2017A is investigated. Methods New biaxial experiments and numerical simulations have been performed with the H-specimen under different load ratios. Digital image correlation shows evolution of strain fields and scanning electron microscopy is used to visualize failure modes on fracture surfaces. Corresponding numerical studies predict stress states to explain damage and fracture processes on the micro-scale. Results The stress state, the load ratio and the loading direction with respect to the principal axes of anisotropy affect the width and orientation of localized strain fields and the formation of damage mechanisms and fracture modes at the micro-level. Conclusions The enhanced experimental program with biaxial tests considering different loading directions and load ratios is suggested for characterization of anisotropic metals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据