4.6 Article

Cutibacterium acnes and Staphylococcus epidermidis: the unmissable modulators of skin inflammatory response

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL DERMATOLOGY
卷 31, 期 3, 页码 406-412

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/exd.14467

关键词

acne; Cutibacterium acnes; dysbiosis; innate immunity; skin inflammation; skin microbiota

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Skin microbiota plays a crucial role in inflammatory skin response, and maintaining a balance between bacterial communities is essential. Imbalance in skin microbiota can activate inflammation-related markers, especially with S. epidermidis having a more significant impact on IL-6 induction.
Acne is a multifactorial inflammatory dermatose that affects all age categories from teenagers to adults, resulting in important psychological impacts. Multiple hypotheses currently attempt to decrypt the physiopathology of this disease, and four main actors were identified as highly implicated in it: hyperkeratinization of the pilosebaceous follicle, hyperseborrheae, host factors (innate immunity) and skin microbiota. In this letter, we present results illustrating the impact of skin microbiota on inflammatory skin response, and how far the proper balance between each bacterial community, especially C. acnes and S. epidermidis, is crucial to maintain an appropriate inflammatory response on the skin. The data presented in this study demonstrate that within the skin microbiota, an imbalance between Cutibacterium acnes and Staphylococcus epidermidis, is able to induce the activation of inflammation-related markers such as IL-1ra, IL-6, IL-8, G-CSF and the molecules C5/C5a, soluble CD14 MIP-3beta, Serpin E1, VCAM-1 and beta-defensin-2. Moreover, S. epidermidis appears to have a more important role than C. acnes on the induction of inflammation-related markers, particularly on IL-6. This work is the basis of future in vitro studies to further understand acne physiopathology, inspiring the development of future innovative therapies based on skin microbiota modulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据