4.7 Article

Robust Image Hashing With Ring Partition and Invariant Vector Distance

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIFS.2015.2485163

关键词

Image hashing; ring partition; invariant distance; image rotation; CIE L*a*b* color space

资金

  1. China 973 Program [2013CB329404, 2012CB326403]
  2. Guangxi Natural Science Foundation [2012GXNSFGA060004, 2015GXNSFDA139040]
  3. Guangxi Bagui Scholar Teams for Innovation and Research
  4. Guangxi Collaborative Innovation Center of Multi-Source Information Integration and Intelligent Processing
  5. Scientific and Technological Research Projects of Guangxi Education Administration [YB2014048]
  6. Project of the Guangxi Key Laboratory of Multi-Source Information Mining and Security [14-A-02-02]
  7. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61300109, 61363034, 61562007, 61450001, 61170131]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Robustness and discrimination are two of the most important objectives in image hashing. We incorporate ring partition and invariant vector distance to image hashing algorithm for enhancing rotation robustness and discriminative capability. As ring partition is unrelated to image rotation, the statistical features that are extracted from image rings in perceptually uniform color space, i.e., CIE L*a*b* color space, are rotation invariant and stable. In particular, the Euclidean distance between vectors of these perceptual features is invariant to commonly used digital operations to images (e.g., JPEG compression, gamma correction, and brightness/contrast adjustment), which helps in making image hash compact and discriminative. We conduct experiments to evaluate the efficiency with 250 color images, and demonstrate that the proposed hashing algorithm is robust at commonly used digital operations to images. In addition, with the receiver operating characteristics curve, we illustrate that our hashing is much better than the existing popular hashing algorithms at robustness and discrimination.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据