4.5 Article

Disentangling the effects of male age and mating history: Contrasting effects of mating history on precopulatory mating behavior and paternity success

期刊

EVOLUTION
卷 75, 期 11, 页码 2867-2880

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/evo.14371

关键词

Ageing; competition; mating experience; postcopulatory; reproductive senescence; sexual selection

资金

  1. Australian Research Council [DP160100285, DP190100279]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using eastern mosquitofish for experiments, this study found that old males and males with no mating experience spent more time approaching females and attempting to mate than young males and those with greater mating experience. Old males benefited from previous mating experience, while young males did not.
Many studies ask whether young or older males are better at acquiring mates. Even so, how age affects reproductive success is still poorly understood because male age and mating history are confounded in most studies: older males usually have more mating experience. To what extent does mating history rather than age explain variation in male mating success? And how do mating history and male age determine paternity when there is also postcopulatory sexual selection? Here, we experimentally manipulated the mating history of old and young males in the eastern mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki). We then recorded male mating behavior and share of paternity (1259 offspring from 232 potential sires) when they competed for mates and fertilizations. Old males, and males with no mating experience, spent significantly more time approaching females, and attempting to mate, than did young males and those with greater mating experience. Male age and mating history interacted to affect paternity: old males benefited from having previous mating experience, but young males did not. Our results highlight that the age-related changes in male reproductive traits and in paternity that have been described in many taxa may be partly attributable to male mating history and not simply to age itself.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据