4.5 Article

Surveillance of leishmaniasis cases from 15 European centres, 2014 to 2019: a retrospective analysis

期刊

EUROSURVEILLANCE
卷 27, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

EUR CENTRE DIS PREVENTION & CONTROL
DOI: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2022.27.4.2002028

关键词

-

资金

  1. DGD-Belgium
  2. University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study collected retrospectively records of leishmaniasis cases diagnosed in 15 centers between 2014 and 2019, and analyzed data on country of infection, reason for traveling, infecting species, age, and sex. The results showed that visceral leishmaniasis was mainly acquired in Europe, while cutaneous leishmaniasis was primarily imported from outside Europe. The geographic species distribution largely confirmed known epidemiology, with some exceptions. The study highlights the importance of pooling species typing data from multiple centers to monitor changing epidemiology.
Background: Surveillance of human leishmaniasis in Europe is mostly limited to country-specific information from autochthonous infections in the southern part. As at the end of 2021, no integrated analysis has been performed for cases seen across centres in different European countries. Aim: To provide a broad perspective on autochthonous and imported leishmaniasis cases in endemic and non-endemic countries in Europe. Methods: We retrospectively collected records from cutaneous, mucosal and visceral leishmaniasis cases diagnosed in 15 centres between 2014 and 2019. Centres were located in 11 countries: Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. Data on country of infection, reason for travelling, infecting species, age and sex were analysed. Results: We obtained diagnostic files from 1,142 cases, of which 76%, 21% and 3% had cutaneous, visceral, and mucosal disease, respectively. Of these, 68% were men, and 32% women, with the median age of 37 years (range: 0-90) at diagnosis. Visceral leishmaniasis was mainly acquired in Europe (88%; 167/190), while cutaneous leishmaniasis was primarily imported from outside Europe (77%; 575/749). Sixty-two percent of cutaneous leishmaniasis cases from outside Europe were from the Old World, and 38% from the New World. Geographic species distribution largely confirmed known epidemiology, with notable exceptions. Conclusions: Our study confirms previous reports regarding geographic origin, species, and traveller subgroups importing leishmaniasis into Europe. We demonstrate the importance of pooling species typing data from many centres, even from areas where the aetiology is presumably known, to monitor changing epidemiology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据