4.1 Article

Prevention of Intra-Abdominal Adhesions Using the Combination of Mediclore® and a Statin

期刊

EUROPEAN SURGICAL RESEARCH
卷 63, 期 3, 页码 123-131

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000519708

关键词

Adhesion barrier; Steroid; Poloxamer; Postoperative adhesion

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The intraperitoneal application of Mediclore and the combination of Mediclore and rosuvastatin effectively reduced postoperative adhesions in a rat model, demonstrating a strong antiadhesive effect.
Purpose: This study investigated the antiadhesive effects of Mediclore (R), rosuvastatin, and a combination of Mediclore and rosuvastatin in a rat adhesion model. Methods: The adhesion models (a total of 58 adult male rats) were divided into 4 groups. The control group (group C) received no special materials except for a saline. The experimental groups were treated with 5 mL of Mediclore (group M), rosuvastatin (group R), or rosuvastatin and Mediclore (group RM), and these materials were intraperitoneally placed under the incision. At postoperative day 14, the rats underwent re-laparotomy and adhesiolysis. Three investigators blinded to group assignment scored the extent of adhesion formation, the numbers of remote adhesions, and the extent of acute/chronic inflammation, fibrosis, edema, and congestion on resected specimens via histologic examination. Results: The macroscopic adhesion score in group RM (7.27 +/- 3.51) was significantly lower than those in groups C (13.36 +/- 2.24) and R (11.71 +/- 1.98); group M (9.13 +/- 4.09) had a significantly lower adhesion score than group C. The number of remote adhesions was significantly lower in groups R and RM than in group C. The acute inflammation score, chronic inflammation score, and fibrosis score in group RM; the acute inflammation score in group R; and the fibrosis score in group M were significantly lower than those in group C. Conclusion: The intraperitoneal application of Mediclore and a combination of Mediclore and rosuvastatin effectively reduced postoperative adhesions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据