4.4 Article

Analysis of the second wave of COVID-19 in India based on SEIR model

期刊

EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL-SPECIAL TOPICS
卷 231, 期 18-20, 页码 3453-3460

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1140/epjs/s11734-022-00426-8

关键词

-

资金

  1. SERB-DST-MATRICS Grant [MTR/2018/000676]
  2. Department of Science and Technology of a DST-SERB National Science Chair [NSC/2020/000029]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article discusses the situation of the second wave of COVID-19 in India and estimates the number of infected individuals using the SEIR model. The findings show that individual efforts and government actions are the most important factors in controlling the pandemic.
India was under a grave threat from the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic particularly in the beginning of May 2021. The situation appeared rather gloomy as the number of infected individuals/active cases had increased alarmingly during the months of May and June 2021 compared to the first wave peak. Indian government/state governments have been implementing various control measures such as lockdowns, setting up new hospitals, and putting travel restrictions at various stages to lighten the virus spread from the initial outbreak of the pandemic. Recently, we have studied the susceptible-exposed-infectious-removed (SEIR) dynamic modeling of the epidemic evolution of COVID-19 in India with the help of appropriate parameters quantifying the various governmental actions and the intensity of individual reactions. Our analysis had predicted the scenario of the first wave quite well. In this present article, we extend our analysis to estimate and analyze the number of infected individuals during the second wave of COVID-19 in India with the help of the above SEIR model. Our findings show that the people's individual effort along with governmental actions such as implementations of curfews and accelerated vaccine strategy are the most important factors to control the pandemic in the present situation and in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据