4.6 Article

The potential of improving wood preservative penetration into glued wood products bonded with one-component polyurethane by discontinuous adhesive bondline design

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF WOOD AND WOOD PRODUCTS
卷 80, 期 1, 页码 223-234

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00107-021-01753-8

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Regional Development Fund [1.1.1.1/18/A/023]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Impregnation of glued wood products is crucial for outdoor use or building construction, but the timing and method of impregnation can affect bond quality. Specific adhesive application designs can improve impregnation efficiency, but may also impact bond strength of wood specimens.
As a vast majority of glued wood products are intended for outdoor use or for building construction, impregnation with different agents is important for ensuring proper performance. It has been shown that the impregnation prior to gluing has several disadvantages, therefore the possibility of carrying out impregnation after gluing is analysed in the present research. Impregnation efficiency as well as the effect on the bond quality is evaluated for the one-component polyurethane glued wood specimens. The results showed that the impregnation with Cu preservative after gluing did not affect the shear strength of the glued wood specimens, but did significantly restrict Cu preservative penetration due to the adhesive bondlines. Considering the results, the possibility of improving the impregnation efficiency was also investigated. By using specific adhesive application designs, which cover the bondline only partially, it was possible to improve the impregnation efficiency. However, the Cu distribution was inhomogeneous and the improvement was noticeable only up to the second bondline. The partial adhesive application design also affected the bond strength of glued wood specimens, which resulted in a decrease both in dry and wet state. However, the reduction was not so sever as to cause delamination during three consecutive wetting and drying cycles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据