4.5 Article

Synthesis and Fluorescence Mechanism of the Aminoimidazolone Analogues of the Green Fluorescent Protein: Towards Advanced Dyes with Enhanced Stokes Shift, Quantum Yield and Two-Photon Absorption

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 2021, 期 41, 页码 5649-5660

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/ejoc.202101173

关键词

Fluorescence; GFP analogues; Stokes shift; Two-photon fluorescence

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Novel small-molecular analogues of the green fluorescence protein (GFP) chromophore were synthesised to expand and improve this fluorophore family and deepen the understanding of their fluorescence mechanism. The introduction of specific substituents and manipulation of the molecular structure successfully enhanced fluorescence emission intensity and altered spectral properties.
Novel small-molecular analogues the green fluorescence protein (GFP) chromophore were synthesised to expand and improve this fluorophore family and to deepen the understanding of their fluorescence mechanism. The introduction of an aminophenyl substituent and the repositioning of the hydroxyl group, to enable strong intramolecular hydrogen bonding, not only enhanced fluorescence emission but also resulted in an increased Stokes shift and a considerable redshift. Experimental and computational results described dual fluorescence involving both excited-state intramolecular proton transfer and internal charge transfer (ESIPT-ICT) mechanisms. Screening of the pH and the solvent medium revealed a complicated equilibrium involving hydrogen bonding, protonation and deprotonation that influences the absorption and emission spectra. Further improvement of the photophysical properties via the systematic variation of dialkylamino substituents at a single position of the chromophore led to a two-orders of magnitude enhancement in the quantum yields. In addition, the novel compounds also have significant two-photon absorption, which widens the possibilities for applications in the field of bioimaging.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据