4.8 Article

Design and Real-Time Controller Implementation for a Battery-Ultracapacitor Hybrid Energy Storage System

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL INFORMATICS
卷 12, 期 5, 页码 1910-1918

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TII.2016.2575798

关键词

Battery state-of-health (SoH) estimation; hybrid energy storage system (HESS); real-time energy management

资金

  1. Div Of Electrical, Commun & Cyber Sys
  2. Directorate For Engineering [1307228] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, two real-time energy management strategies have been investigated for optimal current split between batteries and ultracapacitors (UCs) in electric vehicle applications. In the first strategy, an optimization problem is formulated and solved using Karush-Kuhn-Tucker conditions to obtain the real-time operation points of current split for the hybrid energy storage system (HESS). In the second strategy, a neural network-based strategy is implemented as an intelligent controller for the proposed system. To evaluate the performance of these two real-time strategies, a performance metric based on the battery state-of-health (SoH) is developed to reveal the relative impact of instantaneous battery currents on the battery degradation. A 38 V-385 Wh battery and a 32 V-4.12 Wh UC HESS hardware prototype has been developed and a real-time experimental platform has been built for energy management controller validation, using xPC Target and National Instrument data acquisition system. Both the simulation and real-time experiment results have successfully validated the real-time implementation feasibility and effectiveness of the two real-time controller designs. It is shown that under a high speed, high acceleration, aggressive drive cycle US06, the two real-time energy management strategies can greatly reduce the battery peak current and consequently decreases the battery SoH reduction by 31% and 38% in comparison to a battery-only energy storage system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据