4.5 Article

Effect of the perception of breakfast consumption on subsequent appetite and energy intake in healthy males

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
卷 61, 期 3, 页码 1319-1330

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00394-021-02727-5

关键词

Breakfast skipping; Energy intake; Energy balance; Appetite hormones; Placebo feeding

资金

  1. Nottingham Trent University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Eating a very-low-energy placebo breakfast doesn't change lunch energy intake, but may decrease total energy intake across breakfast and lunch, and reduce subjective appetite increases related to skipping breakfast. Eating a full-food breakfast resulted in lower lunch energy intake compared to water-only breakfast, and total energy intake was lower for the placebo and water-only breakfasts compared to the full-food breakfast. Additionally, subjective hunger, desire to eat, and prospective food consumption AUC were lower and fullness AUC was higher for both the placebo and full-food breakfasts compared to water-only breakfast.
Purpose This study aimed to assess the effects of consuming a very-low-energy placebo breakfast on subsequent appetite and lunch energy intake. Methods Fourteen healthy males consumed water-only (WAT), very-low-energy, viscous placebo (containing water, low-calorie flavoured squash, and xanthan gum; similar to 16 kcal; PLA), and whole-food (similar to 573 kcal; FOOD) breakfasts in a randomised order. Subjects were blinded to the energy content of PLA and specific study aims. Venous blood samples were collected pre-breakfast, 60- and 180-min post-breakfast to assess plasma acylated ghrelin and peptide tyrosine tyrosine concentrations. Subjective appetite was measured regularly, and energy intake was assessed at an ad libitum lunch meal 195-min post-breakfast. Results Lunch energy intake was lower during FOOD compared to WAT (P < 0.05), with no further differences between trials (P >= 0.132). Cumulative energy intake (breakfast plus lunch) was lower during PLA (1078 +/- 274 kcal) and WAT (1093 +/- 249 kcal), compared to FOOD (1554 +/- 301 kcal; P < 0.001). Total area under the curve (AUC) for hunger, desire to eat and prospective food consumption were lower, and fullness was greater during PLA and FOOD compared to WAT (P < 0.05). AUC for hunger was lower during FOOD compared to PLA (P < 0.05). During FOOD, acylated ghrelin was suppressed compared to PLA and WAT at 60 min (P < 0.05), with no other hormonal differences between trials (P >= 0.071). Conclusion Consuming a very-low-energy placebo breakfast does not alter energy intake at lunch but may reduce cumulative energy intake across breakfast and lunch and attenuate elevations in subjective appetite associated with breakfast omission.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据