4.5 Article

Validation of a digital, tablet-based version of the Trail Making Test in the increment elta platform

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 55, 期 2, 页码 461-467

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ejn.15541

关键词

computerized assessment; digital neuropsychology; digitization of neuropsychological assessment; mobile application; paper- and tablet-based comparison; Trail Making Test

资金

  1. University of Koblenz-Landau

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using digital technology for neuropsychological assessment is becoming popular. This study compared a digital version of the Trail Making Test with the standard paper version and found significant correlation between the two. Participants were generally faster on the digital platform. Traditional Trail Making Tests can be successfully adapted to a digital platform with new normative data.
Using digital technology for neuropsychological assessment is gaining popularity in both clinical and research settings. Digital neuropsychology offers many benefits over the traditional paper-pencil assessments; however, their comparability requires further validation. The aim of this study was to compare a digital, tablet-based Trail Making Test to the standard paper version. In a within-subject design, 108 healthy adults completed both digital and paper Trail Making Test in a counterbalanced order. Each participant also performed other tasks measuring core executive abilities (inhibition, working memory, and flexibility) on the tablet. Our findings indicated that the Trail Making Test performance on the two different modalities correlated significantly. Furthermore, correlations of Trail Making Test performance with other cognitive tasks revealed that digital Trail Making Test is comparable with the paper version. However, the modality had a significant effect on Trail Making Test performance; that is, participants were generally faster on the digital platform. Taken together, our findings suggest that with new normative data, traditional Trail Making Test can be adapted successfully to a digital platform.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据