4.7 Article

Design, synthesis and evaluation of novel 5-phenylthiophene derivatives as potent fungicidal of Candida albicans and antifungal reagents of fluconazole-resistant fungi

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2021.113740

关键词

Azole antifungals; CYP51; Fluconazole-resistance; Fungicidal agents

资金

  1. Program for Innovative Research Team of the Ministry of Education
  2. Program for Liaoning Innovative Research Team in University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of novel 5-phenylthiophene derivatives were designed and synthesized to combat fungal infections, with compounds 17b and 17f showing significant antifungal activities. These compounds not only prevented the formation of fungal biofilms, but also displayed satisfactory fungicidal activity against various strains. Compound 17f exhibited potent antifungal activity by inhibiting C. albicans CYP51, and both 17b and 17f were almost non-toxic to mammalian cells, indicating their promise as novel antifungal drugs.
A series of 5-phenylthiophene derivatives with novel structures were designed and synthesized to combat the increasing incidence of susceptible and drug-resistant fungal infections. The antifungal activity of the synthesized compounds was assessed against seven susceptible strains and six fluconazole-resistant strains. It is especially encouraging that compounds 17b and 17f displayed significant antifungal activities against all tested strains. Furthermore, the potent compounds 17b and 17f could prevent the formation of fungi biofilms and 17f displayed satisfactory fungicidal activity. Preliminary mechanistic studies showed that the potent antifungal activity of compound 17f stemmed from inhibition of C. albicans CYP51. In addition, Compounds 17b and 17f were almost nontoxic to mammalian A549, MCF7, and THLE-2 cells. These results strongly suggested that compounds 17b and 17f are promising as novel antifungal drugs. (C) 2021 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据