4.7 Article

Synthesis, functional proteomics and biological evaluation of new 5-pyrazolyl ureas as potential anti-angiogenic compounds

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2021.113872

关键词

5-Pyrazolyl ureas; Protein-ligand interactions; Functional proteomics; Drug affinity responsive target stability; Limited proteolysis; Angiogenesis; Serine/threonine-protein phosphatase PP1 gamma

资金

  1. POR CAMPANIA FESR 2014/2020 Asse 1 - Obiettivo specifico 1.2 - Azione 1.2
  2. Progetto: Campania OncoTerapie [CUP: B61G18000470007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, new benzyl-urea derivatives were synthesized, among which 4e showed potent inhibition of HUVEC proliferation. The potential target of 4e in HUVEC was identified as PP1 gamma through interactome analysis, suggesting an interesting anti-angiogenic action at the intracellular level.
Based on biological results of previous synthesized pyrazolyl ureas able to interfere with angiogenesis process, we planned and synthesized the new benzyl-urea derivatives 2-4; some of them showed an interesting anti-proliferative profile and particularly 4e potently inhibited HUVEC proliferation. To shed light on the mechanism of action of 4e, its interactome has been deeply inspected to identify the most prominent protein partners, mainly taking into account kinome and phosphatome, through drug affinity responsive target stability experiments, followed by targeted limited proteolysis analysis. From these studies, PP1 gamma emerged as the most reliable 4e potential target in HUVEC. Molecular docking simulations on PP1 gamma were carried out to predict 4e binding mode. To assess its potential anti-angiogenic effect, 4e was tested in vitro to verify interference on kinase and phosphate activities. Overall, our results evidenced for 4e an interesting anti-angiogenic action, probably due to its action at intracellular level on PP1 gamma signalling pathways. (C) 2021 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据