4.7 Article

AZD5438-PROTAC: A selective CDK2 degrader that protects against cisplatin- and noise-induced hearing loss

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2021.113849

关键词

CDK2-Proteolysis; PROTAC; Cisplatin-induced hearing loss; Noise-induced hearing loss

资金

  1. ALSAC [P30CA21765]
  2. Bellucci Foundation
  3. [NIH-R01DC015444]
  4. [NIH-R01DC015010]
  5. [USAMRMC-RH170030]
  6. [ONR-N00014-18-12507]
  7. [DoD-RH190050]
  8. [LB692/Creighton]
  9. [1P20GM139762-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study introduced a new class of small molecules called PROTACs that can effectively degrade the CDK2 protein, with PROTAC-8 showing potential therapeutic activities. Experimental results demonstrated that PROTAC-8 can protect zebrafish from drug-induced auditory and neurotoxicity, indicating its promising role in treating hearing loss and cancer.
Cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (CDK2) is a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of hearing loss and cancer. Previously, we identified AZD5438 and AT7519-7 as potent inhibitors of CDK2, however, they also targeted additional kinases, leading to unwanted toxicities. Proteolysis Targeting Chimeras (PROTACs) are a new promising class of small molecules that can effectively direct specific proteins to proteasomal degradation. Herein we report the design, synthesis, and characterization of PROTACs of AT7519-7 and AZD5438 and the identification of PROTAC-8, an AZD5438-PROTAC, that exhibits selective, partial CDK2 degradation. Furthermore, PROTAC-8 protects against cisplatin ototoxicity and kainic acid excitotoxicity in zebrafish. Molecular dynamics simulations reveal the structural requirements for CDK2 degradation. Together, PROTAC-8 is among the first-in-class PROTACs with in vivo therapeutic activities and represents a new lead compound that can be further developed for better efficacy and selectivity for CDK2 degradation against hearing loss and cancer. (C) 2021 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据