4.5 Article

Unravelling the Mystery: Enlightenment of the Uncommon Electrochemistry of Naphthalene Monoimide [FeFe] Hydrogenase Mimics

期刊

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/ejic.202100959

关键词

Cyclic voltammetry; [FeFe] hydrogenase; Naphthalene monoimide; Quantum chemistry; Spectroelectrochemistry

资金

  1. German Science Foundation (DFG) [TRR234, 364549901]
  2. Projekt DEAL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hydrogenase mimicking complexes with N-substituted naphthalene monoimide (NMI) of peri-substituted dichalcogenides as bridging ligands were prepared and characterized using various spectroscopic techniques. The redox behavior of these complexes was investigated through cyclic voltammetry, IR and UV-Vis spectroelectrochemistry, EPR spectroscopy and quantum chemical simulations. EPR experiments revealed the non-innocent character of the NMI bridging ligands, showing the formation of an organic radical and a dimeric structure after successive reductions.
[FeFe] hydrogenase mimicking complexes containing N-substituted naphthalene monoimide (NMI) of peri-substituted dichalcogenides as bridging ligands have been prepared and characterized using different spectroscopic as well as by X-ray diffraction methods. The redox behaviour has been investigated by cyclic voltammetry, IR and UV-Vis spectroelectrochemistry (IR and UV-Vis SEC), electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy and quantum chemical simulations. IR SEC and EPR experiments combined with DFT calculations revealed the non-innocent character of the NMI bridging ligands. EPR spectroscopy was applied to study the singly and doubly reduced state. Chemical reduction with one equivalent of Cp*Co-2 revealed the formation of an organic radical with a g-value of 2.0028 at room temperature. When two equivalents of Cp*Co-2 were used to carry out the second reduction, no EPR signal could be detected anymore. IR SEC measurements indicate the formation of an EPR-silent dimeric structure after the second reduction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据