4.8 Article

Torque Density Improvement of Doubly Salient Electromagnetic Machine With Asymmetric Current Control

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS
卷 63, 期 12, 页码 7434-7443

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2016.2594761

关键词

Angle position control (APC); brushless dc motor; doubly salient motor; field winding; torque density

资金

  1. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-13-0858]
  2. Fok Ying-tung Education Foundation [141056]
  3. Jiangsu Provincial Science Funds for Distinguished Young Scientists [BK20150033]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Due to the introduction of field winding, the doubly salient electromagnetic (DSEM) machine is featured with good torque production capability. However, this capability is limited by the problems of the phase current reversal and excessive back-electromotive force with traditional control methods. In this paper, a new control method, namely asymmetric current control (ASCC), is proposed to further improve the output torque. Two control angles a and. are introduced to implement the current-angle control. Simultaneously, the pulse width modulation control is utilized to shape the waveform of phase current. Consequently, the torque is increased drastically because of more effective phase current waveforms, which presents the asymmetry of positive and negative half period. Furthermore, the reluctance torque resulting from the interaction between self-inductance and asymmetric phase current exerts favorable effects on the torque output. By field-circuit-coupled analysis, the ASCC method for a 1.3 kW prototype is analyzed and compared with other traditional control methods. Laboratory testing of the 1.3 kWDSEM machine driven by the new control method confirms the validity of theoretical analysis and simulation improvement of torque. The simulation and experimental results show that the torque and power density can be improved to 1.5 times by the proposed control method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据