4.7 Article

Large Margin Multi-Modal Multi-Task Feature Extraction for Image Classification

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING
卷 25, 期 1, 页码 414-427

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIP.2015.2495116

关键词

Feature extraction; image classification; multi-task; multi-modal; large margin

资金

  1. Microsoft Research Asia
  2. Singapore Ministry of Education under Grant Tier 1 [RG17/14]
  3. National Key Technology RD Program [2015BAF15B00]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61375026, 61572463]
  5. Australian Research Council [DP-140102164, FT-130101457]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The features used in many image analysis-based applications are frequently of very high dimension. Feature extraction offers several advantages in high-dimensional cases, and many recent studies have used multi-task feature extraction approaches, which often outperform single-task feature extraction approaches. However, most of these methods are limited in that they only consider data represented by a single type of feature, even though features usually represent images from multiple modalities. We, therefore, propose a novel large margin multi-modal multi-task feature extraction (LM3FE) framework for handling multi-modal features for image classification. In particular, LM3FE simultaneously learns the feature extraction matrix for each modality and the modality combination coefficients. In this way, LM3FE not only handles correlated and noisy features, but also utilizes the complementarity of different modalities to further help reduce feature redundancy in each modality. The large margin principle employed also helps to extract strongly predictive features, so that they are more suitable for prediction (e.g., classification). An alternating algorithm is developed for problem optimization, and each subproblem can be efficiently solved. Experiments on two challenging real-world image data sets demonstrate the effectiveness and superiority of the proposed method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据