4.6 Article

The first operations of Mo.SE system to prevent the flooding of Venice: Insights on the hydrodynamics of a regulated lagoon

期刊

ESTUARINE COASTAL AND SHELF SCIENCE
卷 261, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecss.2021.107547

关键词

Venice Lagoon; Mo; S; E; system; Intra-gate infiltration; Wind drag coefficient; Wind setup; Sea level disturbance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The closure of the Venice Lagoon in October 2020 for the first time in history due to the Mo.S.E. system's operation not only prevented flooding but also led to unprecedented hydrodynamic scenarios. The closure facilitated a better understanding of wind effects on tide propagation, as well as the evaluation of gate operations' impact on seaward disturbance and infiltration into the lagoon.
In October 2020, for the first time in its thousand-year-old history, the Venice Lagoon has been temporarily closed. The first operations of the Mo.S.E. system, a set of artificial barriers built to isolate the lagoon from the sea in case of high tides, prevented Venice and the other lagoonal settlements from flooding. Beyond its historical value, the closure of the lagoon inlets has led to unprecedented scenarios from a hydrodynamic standpoint. With the Mo.S.E. system operational, significant high tides can no longer be recorded within the lagoon and the undisturbed tide propagation can only be estimated through hydrodynamic modelling. When the inlets are closed and the effect of tide propagation nullified, the action of wind on cross-lagoon setup is enhanced and becomes more clearly recognizable, allowing for a robust calibration of the wind drag coefficient also for low to moderate wind speed. Furthermore, the data collected during the first closures of the Mo.S.E. gates allowed evaluating the real intra-gate infiltration entering the lagoon through the closed gates, and suggested that the gate operation produces some seaward disturbance as well.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据