4.4 Article

Risk factors for psychiatric adverse effects associated with perampanel therapy

期刊

EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR
卷 124, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2021.108356

关键词

Adverse effects; Perampanel; Psychosis; Intellectual disability

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [JP 20K16068]
  2. Research Foundation for Pharmaceutical Sciences
  3. Japan Council of National Hospital Pharmacy Directors

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study retrospectively evaluated the adverse effects of perampanel in 895 Japanese epilepsy patients and found that younger age, intellectual disability, and psychiatric comorbidity were risk factors for psychiatric adverse effects. Caution should be taken in dose titration and therapeutic drug monitoring in patients with these conditions.
Purpose: To identify the risk factors for psychiatric adverse effects associated with perampanel therapy. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the adverse effects of perampanel by reviewing clinical records from 895 Japanese patients with epilepsy (aged 1-86 years) who started perampanel therapy at National Epilepsy Center, Shizuoka, Japan, between June 2016 and December 2019. Patients were classi-fied into 3 groups: those without adverse effects (Group I), those with psychiatric adverse effects (Group II), and those with common adverse effects (Group III). Results: The number of patients assigned to each group was as follows: Group I, n = 641; Group II, n = 93; and Group III, n = 161. The mean follow-up period was 458 +/- 265 days (median, 511 days). Kaplan-Meier survival estimates showed that the median time to treatment failure was shorter in Group II than in Group III (294 vs. 392 days, respectively; log-rank test, p < 0.001). According to polytomous logistic regression, younger age (<16 years) was associated with a lower risk of common and psychiatric adverse effects. The risk factors for psychiatric adverse effects (Group II) were intellectual disability (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.6; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.5-4.5) and psychiatric comorbidity (AOR, 3.8; 95% CI, 2.3-6.3); in patients with intellectual disability, the occurrence of psychiatric adverse effects was con-centration dependent. Patients with lamotrigine use had a 0.54-fold lower risk of psychiatric adverse effects. In Group III, concomitant use of inducers was associated with a decreased risk of common adverse effects (AOR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.46-0.99). Significance: We found clear differences in the risk factors for psychiatric adverse effects. In patients with intellectual disability, care must be taken when titrating perampanel, and therapeutic drug monitoring should be performed. (c) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据