4.7 Article

Photocatalytic degradation of imidacloprid by optimized Bi2WO6/NH2-MIL-88B(Fe) composite under visible light

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 29, 期 13, 页码 19583-19593

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-17187-x

关键词

Degradation; Metal-organic frameworks; Bi2WO6; Photocatalytic; Imidacloprid; Heterojunction

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31601550]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Hunan [2019JJ50638]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study utilized MOFs to improve the light absorption and degradation performance of Bi2WO6 semiconductor, successfully synthesizing a Bi2WO6/NH2-MIL-88B(Fe) heterojunction photocatalyst with high-performance photocatalytic degradation activities. The high-efficiency 1:2 BNM exhibited optimal charge separation and carrier recombination rates, with cycle experiments confirming good reusability and stability of the composite photocatalyst.
Imidacloprid as a widely used neonicotinoid insecticide can cause harmful pesticide residue inevitably. Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) were innovatively composited to improve the light absorption and degradation performance of Bi2WO6 semiconductor, which expanded the photodegradation application in solving environmental problems. Based on the synergistic effect of Bi2WO6 and NH2-MIL-88B(Fe), a Bi2WO6/NH2-MIL-88B(Fe) (BNM) heterojunction photocatalyst with high-performance of photocatalytic degradation activities was successfully synthesized. The optimized BNM catalyst had a good degradation rate under visible light, which was mainly caused by generation of the active center dot OH. Transient photocurrent response and electrochemical impedance tests verified that 1:2 BNM exhibits a highest charge separation and a lowest carrier recombination rate which were favorable to the photocatalytic activity. Cycle experiments show that the composite photocatalyst had good reusability and stability which were very important for potential industry applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据