4.7 Article

Assessing the impact of digital financial inclusion on PM2.5 concentration: evidence from China

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 29, 期 15, 页码 22547-22554

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-17030-3

关键词

Digital finance; PM2.5 concentration; GMM; Threshold model

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Digital finance, as a new technology-driven business model, shortens the distance between borrowers and lenders, promoting economic efficiency by reducing transaction costs, information asymmetry, and inequality. However, the industry is energy-intensive and can damage the environment, although it has been shown to reduce pollution when its development exceeds a certain level. This indicates that high levels of digital finance not only increase economic growth but also improve air quality, providing novel insight into the relationship between economic growth and the environment.
Digital finance as a new technology-driven business model shortens the distance between borrowers and lenders. Economic research finds that digital finance promotes economic efficiency by reducing transaction costs, information asymmetry, and inequality. Digital finance is an energy-intensive industry; therefore, increased efficiency in the industry should yield environmental benefits. We examine the externality of digital finance on air pollution. By analyzing data on digital financial inclusion and fine particulate matter concentration in China, we demonstrate using a dynamic panel data model that the development of digital finance damages the environment. However, after incorporating a threshold effect into a kink model, we determine that digital finance reduces pollution when its development exceeds a certain level. The results suggest that a high level of digital finance development not only increases economic growth but also improves air quality; this result provides novel insight into the relationship between economic growth and the environment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据