4.7 Article

Can the incentives polices promote the diffusion of distributed photovoltaic power in China?

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 29, 期 20, 页码 30394-30409

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-17753-3

关键词

Incentives policy; Distributed photovoltaic power plants; Technology diffusion; System dynamics; Cost reduction

资金

  1. Beijing Municipal Social Science Foundation [16JDYJB031]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2018ZD14]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study combines the learning curve and system dynamics model to investigate the dynamic diffusion process of China's distributed photovoltaic power. The results indicate that technological innovation is the driving force behind cost reduction, demand-pull and technology-push policies both contribute to the diffusion of distributed photovoltaic power, and the fixed feed-in tariff policy has a more significant impact on diffusion compared to research and development policy.
Government incentive policies play an important role in the promotion of distributed photovoltaic power. However, which policy is more effective for the diffusion of distributed photovoltaic power? This is a question that needs to be answered. Based on this, we combined the two-factor learning curve and system dynamics model to study the dynamic diffusion process of China's distributed photovoltaic power (DSP). The results show that (1) the coefficients of learning by doing and learning by researching for DSP are 0.0435 and 0.2971 respectively. This indicates that technological innovation caused by R&D expenditures in the DSP is the driving force for cost reduction. (2) Both demand-pull and technology-push policies contribute to the diffusion of DSP; (3) the effect of FIT policy on the diffusion of distributed photovoltaic technology is more significant than that of R&D policy; and the reduction of production cost of photovoltaic power industry by R&D policy is more significant than FIT policy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据