4.7 Article

The impact of financial development on CO2 emissions: new evidence from developed and emerging countries

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 29, 期 21, 页码 31453-31466

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-18533-3

关键词

Financial markets; Financial institutions; Renewable energy; CO2 emissions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Financial market development has a positive impact on reducing CO2 emissions, while the effects of financial institution development vary for different types of economies. The use of renewable energy is identified as an effective solution for mitigating CO2 emissions.
Taking into account the complicated and multidimensional nature of financial development, this study aims to investigate the impact of overall financial market development, institution development, and their sub-indices on CO2 emissions. To advance knowledge about the nexus between financial development and CO2 emissions, four financial market indices (overall financial market development, FM-access, FM-depth, and FM-efficiency) and four financial institution indices (overall financial institution development, FI-access, FI-depth, and FI-efficiency) are used. The study used two-stage system GMM and panel data of developed and emerging countries over the period 2000-2018. The empirical results reveal that the overall financial market development and its sub-indices (FM-access, FM-depth, and FM-efficiency) reduce CO2 emissions in developed and emerging countries. The results further show that the overall financial institution development and its sub-indices such as FI-access, FI-depth, and FI-efficiency foster the environment quality in developed economies, while these indices impede the environmental quality in emerging economies. The usage of renewable energy is found to be a viable solution to mitigate the CO2 emissions in both groups of countries. Additionally, policies related to sustainable development are also discussed in the paper.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据