4.7 Article

Mechanisms and histopathological impacts of acetamiprid and azoxystrobin in male rats

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 29, 期 28, 页码 43114-43125

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-18331-3

关键词

Lutilizing hormone; Follicle-stimulating hormone; Nitric oxide; Calcium; Sperm count; Male rat

资金

  1. Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia [TURSP-2020/112]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the effects of acetamiprid and azoxystrobin on male rats. It found that these pesticides disrupted oxidative and metabolic processes, leading to testis damage. Nitric oxide levels increased while enzyme activity and hormone levels decreased. The structure of testis and liver, as well as sperm parameters, were also affected.
Acetamiprid (neonicotinoid insecticide) and azoxystrobin (fungicide) are widespread pesticides used for pest management, but they have the potential for toxicity to mammals. The goal of this study was to look for oxidative stress, metabolic alterations, and reproductive problems in male rats' serum after 2 months of exposure to sub-lethal dosages of acetamiprid and azoxystrobin. Seven classes of male rats were formed: control, 3 groups of acetamiprid (1/10, 1/20, 1/40 LD50), and 3 groups of azoxystrobin (1/10, 1/20, 1/40 LD50) and were orally daily treated (n = 8/group). Our findings revealed that acetamiprid and azoxystrobin disrupted oxidative and metabolic processes in the examined rats throughout 30 and 60 days of testing. The levels of nitric oxide increased significantly, while catalase, a superoxide dismutase enzyme, and glutathione reductase activity were reduced. Serum levels of sex hormones, calcium, and total protein have all dropped substantially in rats. In comparison to the control group, the testis and liver structure, as well as spermatozoa parameters, had distinct histological characteristics. In conclusion, acetamiprid and azoxystrobin exhibit dose- and time-dependent effects on oxidative parameters that cause testis damage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据