4.7 Article

Do environmental pollutants carrier to COVID-19 pandemic? A cross-sectional analysis

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 29, 期 12, 页码 17530-17543

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-17004-5

关键词

Carbon emissions; GHG emissions; Nitrous oxide emissions; COVID-19 pandemic; GLM approach; Cross-country study

资金

  1. King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia [RSP-2021/87]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines the impact of environmental pollutants on the COVID-19 pandemic and healthcare outcomes, finding that greenhouse gases and CO2 emissions are critical factors increasing cases and death rates, while nitrous oxide, carbon, and transport emissions increase the case fatality ratio.
The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is a highly transmitted disease that spreads all over the globe in a short period. Environmental pollutants are considered one of the carriers to spread the COVID-19 pandemic through health damages. Carbon emissions, PM2.5 emissions, nitrous oxide emissions, GHG, and other GHG emissions are mainly judged separately in the earlier studies in different economic settings. The study hypothesizes that environmental pollutants adversely affect healthcare outcomes, likely to infected people by contagious diseases, including coronavirus cases. The subject matter is vital to analyze the preventive healthcare theory by using different environmental pollutants on the COVID-19 factors: total infected cases, total death cases, and case fatality ratio, in a large cross-section of 119 countries. The study employed the generalized least square (GLS) method for robust inferences. The results show that GHG and CO2 emissions are critical factors likely to increase total coronavirus cases and death rates. On the other hand, nitrous oxide, carbon, and transport emissions increase the case fatality ratio through healthcare damages. The study concludes that stringent environmental policies and improving healthcare infrastructure can control coronavirus cases across countries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据