4.8 Article

Vulnerability of Groundwater Resources Underlying Unlined Produced Water Ponds in the Tulare Basin of the San Joaquin Valley, California

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 55, 期 21, 页码 14782-14794

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.1c02056

关键词

produced water; impoundments; groundwater salinization; oil and gas development; San Joaquin Valley

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The investigation highlights the risks posed by the historical and ongoing disposal of oilfield-produced water into unlined produced water ponds (PWPs) on groundwater resources in the San Joaquin Valley, especially in the Tulare Basin. Sparse groundwater monitoring at unlined PWP facilities has shown impacts on aquifers used for public and agricultural water supply, which have proven to be too costly to remediate.
The San Joaquin Valley (SJV) in California is one of the most agriculturally productive regions in the world relying in part on groundwater for irrigation and for domestic or municipal water supply for nearly 4 million residents. One area of growing concern in the SJV is potential impact to groundwater resources from ongoing and historical disposal of oilfield-produced water into unlined produced water ponds (PWPs). In this investigation, we utilized available information on composition of produced water disposed into unlined PWPs and levels of total dissolved solids in underlying groundwater to demonstrate that this disposal practice, both past and present, poses risks to groundwater resources, especially in the Tulare Basin in the southern SJV. Groundwater monitoring at unlined PWP facilities is relatively sparse, but where monitoring has occurred, impact to aquifers used for public and agricultural water supply has been observed and has proven to be too expensive to actively remediate. Results of this investigation should inform policy discussions in California and other locations where disposal of produced water into unlined impoundments occurs, especially at locations that overlie groundwater resources.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据