4.7 Article

The aquaculture supply chain in the time of covid-19 pandemic: Vulnerability, resilience, solutions and priorities at the global scale

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY
卷 127, 期 -, 页码 98-110

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2021.10.014

关键词

Perishable food supply chain; Disruption; Economic distress; Mitigation measures; Integrated multi-trophic aquaculture; Stakeholder perceptions; Rapid assessment; COVID-19 effects

资金

  1. European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation pro-gramme under the Marie Skodowska-Curie Action [835589]
  2. PRIN-MAHRES project (Ministry of Italian Research) [MUR-017MHHWBN_003 Linea C]
  3. Interreg Italia-Malta HARMONY [C1-3.1-31]
  4. FCT/MCTES through national funds [UIDP/50017/2020+UIDB/50017/2020]
  5. Spanish Government funds [PID2019-106008RB-C21]
  6. ERASMUS+-FISHAQU project [610071-EPP-1-2019-1-PT-EPPKA2-CBHE-JP]
  7. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [835589] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The COVID-19 pandemic has had significant and widespread impacts on the aquaculture supply chain, prompting a rapid global assessment to evaluate the effects. Stakeholder perceptions were surveyed to analyze potential issues and solutions in various production stages.
The COVID-19 global pandemic has had severe, unpredictable and synchronous impacts on all levels of perishable food supply chains (PFSC), across multiple sectors and spatial scales. Aquaculture plays a vital and rapidly expanding role in food security, in some cases overtaking wild caught fisheries in the production of high quality animal protein in this PFSC. We performed a rapid global assessment to evaluate the effects of the COVID19 pandemic and related emerging control measures on the aquaculture supply chain. Socio-economic effects of the pandemic were analysed by surveying the perceptions of stakeholders, who were asked to describe potential supply-side disruption, vulnerabilities and resilience patterns along the production pipeline with four main supply chain components: a) hatchery, b) production/processing, c) distribution/logistics and d) market. We also assessed different farming strategies, comparing land-vs. sea-based systems; extensive vs. intensive methods; and with and without integrated multi-trophic aquaculture, IMTA. In addition to evaluating levels and sources of economic distress, interviewees were asked to identify mitigation solutions adopted at local / internal (i.e., farm site) scales, and to express their preference on national / external scale mitigation measures among a set of a priori options. Survey responses identified the potential causes of disruption, ripple effects, sources of food insecurity, and socio-economic conflicts. They also pointed to various levels of mitigation strategies. The collated evidence represents a first baseline useful to address future disaster-driven responses, to reinforce the resilience of the sector and to facilitate the design reconstruction plans and mitigation measures, such as financial aid strategies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据